Annwyn wrote:But...there are a lot of intentional inconsistencies.
I hear that, in GU+, Shino has an Avatar and Kuhn becomes a Lost One. You can say that these apply to them as characteristics, especially the Avatar thing. But those same characteristics are purposely omitted from the game. So there's nothing saying that Atoli can't be a cutter in the NON-canon story, but not a cutter in the actual CANON story.
I know G.U.+'s
story contradicts G.U.'s, but the
characters are basically the same.
Shino being an Epitaph user and Kuhn becoming a lost one are part of the story, not part of their individual character. I have no problem with it not being canon, but it's one thing that hasn't been proven wrong by the actual story. For example, what if we're not shown Haseo's player in the OVA? Couldn't his appearance in G.U.+ be considered canon? What I'm trying to say is, if it doesn't conflict with the game, it should be considered canon.
Annwyn wrote:I mean, think about this. It's like saying Hotaru is really a boy in real life, just because the sound drama, "Let's Meet Offline"--which is very non-canon--says she is. When we know from Firefly that she's a half-Irish girl living in the US.
See, that's something that we know isn't canon, because it's proven wrong by the canon material. I'm talking about things that
aren't proven wrong by canon material.