dothackers.net

Akuta wrote:

The Essence of Transcende wrote:

Akuta wrote:

The Essence of Transcende wrote:ok i will as you this one question abot people being greedy. How long is your wish list for X-mas and how expensive are the things on it?

That's extremely irrelevant. A wish list isn't a "give me this" list. It's an "this is what i would like to have" list.

As for the rest of your post, i'll try to translate it for my brain later. Too tired right now.
To the first two lines though, i can say that you are saying you're better than everyone else. I'm pretty sure i saw a "i'm not like that" somewhere in the big chunk.

Anyways, i'll get back to ya later.

let me make this perfectly clear I never say that i am better then anyone else so just lay off the hole idea of me saying that i am better every one else i just voiced my opinion is that ok????????

You should try to calm down.

And spell better. Ex Dee.

Narayu wrote:And spell better. Ex Dee.

As much as it would help bringing his point across, i don't think it's wise to post like that. It'll just make him angry.

it bothers me

BIG TEXT IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL

Morals and such do change as the times change, but come on, there has to be a certain degree of change and I really don't like the amount of negativity and hatred in todays people is the kind of change, nor degree of change that is needed, as in making this sort of behavior mainstream and acceptable.

The Essence of Transcende: I would read your entire last post, but I had trouble reading and understanding the first few lines.

Not that this is addressing anyone's post, in particular, but being married doesn't automatically make sex sacred. You can be unmarried and still hold sex sacred. People seem to think that once it's official on paper, it's automatically "right."

I believe promiscuous and casual sex is wrong. I don't believe pre-marital sex is wrong.

The society has declined in all aspects as possible.....

I think the biggest thing to watch out for is getting married just so you can have sex. Naturally, sex will be a big part of the married relationship, but it is not something that by itself can make a marriage work. I think you should enter a marriage only after telling yourself that you'll never have sex with the person. If you still want to spend your life with them after thinking that way for awhile, then it's more likely that you're not being guided by feelings of lust.

I haven't read the other posts, but I continue on.

Well I sort of, and sort of don't. I hate the trends and the shallow people, but we've always had that, right?

And most of the people others call "disturbed" such as gore fanatics and "occultists" are usually the most redeemable souls out there.

I just hate most people. Misanthropy was made because our people are so incredibly moronic. I could go on and on about this, but I won't, considering it would probably offend most of the people here.

SatelliteFenrir wrote:I haven't read the other posts, but I continue on.

Well I sort of, and sort of don't. I hate the trends and the shallow people, but we've always had that, right?

And most of the people others call "disturbed" such as gore fanatics and "occultists" are usually the most redeemable souls out there.

I just hate most people. Misanthropy was made because our people are so incredibly moronic. I could go on and on about this, but I won't, considering it would probably offend most of the people here.

O.O

marthwmaster wrote:I think the biggest thing to watch out for is getting married just so you can have sex. Naturally, sex will be a big part of the married relationship, but it is not something that by itself can make a marriage work. I think you should enter a marriage only after telling yourself that you'll never have sex with the person. If you still want to spend your life with them after thinking that way for awhile, then it's more likely that you're not being guided by feelings of lust.

I agree. A real relationship is something not found in today's world. Its hard work, more so you are supporting someone other than yourself.

To me, you take care of your wife, tell her you love her everyday and mean it. Then at the end of the day, there is something to go back to after work. Thats the joy of it all.

But telling someone you really care for them is looked down upon.  Then again, theres always alot of ways to read this. My youngest sister, age 15, for instance is stalked by a 19 year old who is "in love" with her. Everyone in this house knows what hes after, but my sister lets her guard down and allows him to wrap his fingers around her. Too bad for him my Dad was in the marines heh...

At any rate find someone worth getting to. And when you do, when you find out you two really do love each other. It will be like heaven on Earth.

i pretty much summed this whole thread up in my little rant on how mentally ill society is on the making out thread.

Balian wrote:you can tell our world is headed to destruction when a 14 year old makes a thread about making out and says he likes it rough

lawlz, that's sick haha, sorry, got me all choked up. Yeh, "you know our world is headed to destruction when", 11 yr. olds go shopping for thongs with thier father and or mother.....ew, I think i just barfed a lil' in my mouth.

ilona~POW wrote:

Balian wrote:you can tell our world is headed to destruction when a 14 year old makes a thread about making out and says he likes it rough

lawlz, that's sick haha, sorry, got me all choked up. Yeh, "you know our world is headed to destruction when", 11 yr. olds go shopping for thongs with thier father and or mother.....ew, I think i just barfed a lil' in my mouth.

14 yo's making out and 11 yo's shopping for thongs are quite different issues, and the latter is unrrealistic. I'm sure there are the odd handfulls of 11 yo thong wearers, but just because you saw it on South Park or wherever doesn't make it true.

Speaking of the morals of 100 years ago, you might remember a time when 14 year olds were married and making babies, and that was well over 100 years ago. Morals have really gone downhill since medieval times.

So if it was the norm then and not now, or in other words morally acceptable then but not now, wouldn't that mean that morals are fluid and do, in fact, change over time?

Unless of course, the world exists for another couple centuries. I can almost promise this: Everything that can happen will, at one point or another, happen. Back to the originally topic, I have this much to say. Morals only serve to hold you back. JK. In all seriousness, I've found that humans have always been stupid or jerks, it's just that as technology grows they will have more ways to be stupid or jerks. That is life.

^ Pretty much, but that was SO emo.

Balian wrote:besides every once in a while...
EMO=truth

Tell that to my friends.

Balian wrote:well i get like that sometimes

besides every once in a while...

EMO=truth

Most people get like that sometimes puddin'.

EMO=truth?....once...in a while?....I'll have find another example other than yer poem to prove that.

Yer writin ruled though hah sirslussy.

ilona~POW wrote: Yer writin ruled though hah sirslussy.

Your spelling phails.

LOL Emo.

Look, there is an end to this argument.

We just need to accept that, despite the best efforts of a few good people in this world, even those good few have the potential to mess things up further. And those who have managed to achieve a goal of fixing soming in society, is only temporary, because whatever they fixed, be it small or big, will be messed up by the next monkey that runs along.

So let's accept that even if we think the solution to society's ills is to have more injection of Christianity or Islam or Hinduism, that won't fix jack sqwuat, and essentially the world, as we know it, is boned.

The only way to fix anything, is for people to realize that though religion may very well be very essential in their lives, they must realize that they can't simply take everything they learn in a book that was supposedly written by a holy man or a series of holy men, and apply it to a community consisting of multiple cultures and religions. And that we shouldn't take it literally, but simply take from it the lessons learned in terms of what's morally right and wrong. And realize, most importantly, we as a society, of a certain type (being Western Anglo influenced), are not the only society type in the world. And must realize that religion should not be the totem pole standard in laws in any community, nor should be used as a pedastal to get elected into office.

It's a matter of compromise, in both those of the evangelical and secular sense. In that, it's common sense that you will have to take off your Hajab in order to be ID'ed by police to make sure you are who you say you are. No matter be it male or female. Sensivity is secondary to public safety. And that the removal of a bronze mold of an opened bible with words attributed to a verse found in the bible should not be considered a paramount offence and a sign that God is leaving government. Instead, the fact is, we're not getting rid of extreme right-wing, Bible-belt, Republicans out of office anytime soon. And that the fact is, we should be more concerned with the seperation of church and state, in that we should solidify that commitment.

I guess, what I'm trying to say is that, there are those who can function without a religion in their lives pretty God-Damn good, and there are those who just need it, like a crack feign needs his next coke hit. That religion, is essentially, the opium of society, and is a necessary evil we have to tolerate in stride. But what we shouldn't do is promote another so-called "awakening", because about all it will do is isolate a certain aspect of the country further away from the world community.


BUt I know that about all I've said would probably make no sense to a LOT of people, and that I've offically wasted time.

Let's all accept the inevitable everyeone, we're all going to hell.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

EMO = truth???

Bbbbbbbbbrrttt.... pfft...gih.. gih... gih... pbrrrrMuahaa... Dih.. Dih... YehAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!


Ahhhhhh.... ****.... ****.... oh, ****... that was good...

That was one hell of a joke...

Good one...


Wait, you were serious??

...






Dude.


Look, emo is just of bunch of whiny lil' wussy boys, with bad haircuts that their mom's neglected them to even cut, and their dad's pretty much given up and resigned to believe that their sons and daughters are just playing "wannabe fairy squads".


Their music isn't all that great, and their rhetoric, though somewhat true, is slighted in the view of an immature 10 yr old. In that they whine, whine, whine, whine, whine, whine, whine, whine, and look like fairies. They seem to think they are tragic warriors in the path of life with their haircuts, but the only thing tragic about them is that they never held a real job, nor fought in any military action in any major conflict, outside of a game console or PC, and are mostly deluded through music videos.

Plus, they lack one important thing. Large intake of drugs. I mean, they aren't just stupid by the use and abuse of drugs, which can easily be understandable, but they are just simply stupid as they naturally and simply are. Which is one major sad excuse.

I don't think EMO represents any kind of truth, only they are just the next evolutionary ****-chain after goths. And eventually, they will be shund by society as another stupid teenage phase.


So why be all emotional about it (which by the way, is what EMO means, "emotional"), and just get a hair cut, some clothes that actually fit you, and not show the fact taht your a skinny lil **** in a muscle or tight t-shirt with your favorite band on it, and go do something that catches your general interest and can live with doing as a living. Like engineering, cop, firefighter, programmer, whatever. Makes lots of money, have a family, live life good, and hope for the best. Because in the end, in the end, one of these days, we're gonna get NUKED. And what are you gonna do? Whine about it?