Philosophy debate of Religion, and Science

Discuss anything here

Moderator: Moderators

Locked
User avatar
AuraTwilight
IT WAS OVER 9000!
IT WAS OVER 9000!
Posts: 8032
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 5:03 pm

Re: Philosophy debate of Religion, and Science

Post by AuraTwilight »

Baptism is a silly, pointless ritual. Assuming Christianity is valid, for a moment, what does a Baptism actually do? Apparently, it's necessary, or atleast recommended, for getting into Heaven, but why? What's the purpose of the damn thing.

If you're baptized as a baby, you somehow belong to God even though you didn't give consent.
If you're unbaptized as a baby and you die, you don't go to heaven like the first baby despite being exactly alike in every other meaningful way, including the fact that you didn't consciously accept or reject the baptism (though apparently the Pope said babies go to heaven anyway, so what's the point, now? Different subject though)

If you're baptized as an adult, you were probably already a believing Christian, so what benefit did you gain? A shower?
If you're not baptized as an adult, but you're still a believing Christian, what makes you different from that other asshole?
All will obey the mighty Auratwilight
AT, you are officially the greatest person in the world.
DO NOT F*CK WITH AURATWILIGHT!
NEVER EVER lecture AT. He/she is the Dr. House of these boards.
Please do not PM me. Use my email.
User avatar
nobodyknows
Resident cynic
Resident cynic
Posts: 3197
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 5:45 am
Location: You can't really make this look funny anymore.
Contact:

Re: Philosophy debate of Religion, and Science

Post by nobodyknows »

AuraTwilight wrote:Baptism is a silly, pointless ritual. Assuming Christianity is valid, for a moment, what does a Baptism actually do? Apparently, it's necessary, or atleast recommended, for getting into Heaven, but why? What's the purpose of the damn thing.

If you're baptized as a baby, you somehow belong to God even though you didn't give consent.
If you're unbaptized as a baby and you die, you don't go to heaven like the first baby despite being exactly alike in every other meaningful way, including the fact that you didn't consciously accept or reject the baptism (though apparently the Pope said babies go to heaven anyway, so what's the point, now? Different subject though)

If you're baptized as an adult, you were probably already a believing Christian, so what benefit did you gain? A shower?
If you're not baptized as an adult, but you're still a believing Christian, what makes you different from that other asshole?
This. Right here. /thread


I'd state my full opinion, but AT did it more thoroughly.. and in less words x:
Image
User avatar
zaseo
Posts: 1583
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 12:10 pm

Re: Philosophy debate of Religion, and Science

Post by zaseo »

Perhaps going Scifi like, but do you believe people have seen aliens? Are they real, or is it a hoax? Not the best question.
ImageImage
Image
User avatar
S1lentOp
Posts: 1576
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 8:35 pm

Re: Philosophy debate of Religion, and Science

Post by S1lentOp »

The closest thing humans have come to seeing aliens is NASA finding **** on Mars that kind of looks like the fossils of micro-organisms and methane and water.
User avatar
AuraTwilight
IT WAS OVER 9000!
IT WAS OVER 9000!
Posts: 8032
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 5:03 pm

Re: Philosophy debate of Religion, and Science

Post by AuraTwilight »

SilentOp beat me to it. But to add on to what he said, I'm gonna say, before you ask your next question, that although humans haven't yet encountered aliens, doesn't mean they don't exist, given the vastness of the universe. Infact, I guarantee that life exists elsewhere in the universe due to statistical probability. Whether that life is more advanced, just advanced, less advanced, or even SAPIENT is totally unknowable.
All will obey the mighty Auratwilight
AT, you are officially the greatest person in the world.
DO NOT F*CK WITH AURATWILIGHT!
NEVER EVER lecture AT. He/she is the Dr. House of these boards.
Please do not PM me. Use my email.
User avatar
zaseo
Posts: 1583
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 12:10 pm

Re: Philosophy debate of Religion, and Science

Post by zaseo »

If life did exist out there I wonder how would they live. With the technology we have we can only explore so much of the solar system.
ImageImage
Image
User avatar
AuraTwilight
IT WAS OVER 9000!
IT WAS OVER 9000!
Posts: 8032
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 5:03 pm

Re: Philosophy debate of Religion, and Science

Post by AuraTwilight »

Ever read "Solaris"? Chances are if there's life out there in the universe, it's not going to be something so conveniently understandable like, say, a Vulcan, or whatever the hell Yoda is. It'd probably be something totally incomprehensible to a humanity that's never met aliens before, and if it's sentient, it may not be so in any way we can appreciate, such as the titular "Solaris", where the first alien life encountered in the novel's universe is a planet covered in an ocean...but the entire ocean is some sort of singular superconsciousness.
All will obey the mighty Auratwilight
AT, you are officially the greatest person in the world.
DO NOT F*CK WITH AURATWILIGHT!
NEVER EVER lecture AT. He/she is the Dr. House of these boards.
Please do not PM me. Use my email.
User avatar
Advent_Winter
Posts: 693
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 5:22 pm
Location: Earle, Arkansas
Contact:

Re: Philosophy debate of Religion, and Science

Post by Advent_Winter »

Just to add into the mix here with the alien topic. Why should we bother searching for other life out there? I prefer not caring about it, and just revert the focus back on us and the many problems WE'RE having here on Earth. Considering the fact that even we can't get along with our own kind, wouldn't it be potentially risky to find such said beings and possibly interact with them?
Image
User avatar
AuraTwilight
IT WAS OVER 9000!
IT WAS OVER 9000!
Posts: 8032
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 5:03 pm

Re: Philosophy debate of Religion, and Science

Post by AuraTwilight »

Just to add into the mix here with the alien topic. Why should we bother searching for other life out there?
Why not? Even aside from all the "Oh, superior aliens can help us" thing, being the only sentient race can be pretty lonely.
I prefer not caring about it, and just revert the focus back on us and the many problems WE'RE having here on Earth.
I think we can multitask, sweetie. Having a few stations broadcasting "ANYONE OUT THERE?" isn't holding back scientific research by decades or anything.
Considering the fact that even we can't get along with our own kind, wouldn't it be potentially risky to find such said beings and possibly interact with them?
Probably. But everything worth doing is risky.
All will obey the mighty Auratwilight
AT, you are officially the greatest person in the world.
DO NOT F*CK WITH AURATWILIGHT!
NEVER EVER lecture AT. He/she is the Dr. House of these boards.
Please do not PM me. Use my email.
User avatar
zaseo
Posts: 1583
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 12:10 pm

Re: Philosophy debate of Religion, and Science

Post by zaseo »

If you are a believer then what, and where do you think Heaven is, and like? What are the reasons for the other planets? What is the afterlife like before entering Heaven, or Hell?
ImageImage
Image
User avatar
shugo_lover
The Oath Keeper
The Oath Keeper
Posts: 2925
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 7:43 pm
Location: Neverland

Re: Philosophy debate of Religion, and Science

Post by shugo_lover »

AuraTwilight wrote:SilentOp beat me to it. But to add on to what he said, I'm gonna say, before you ask your next question, that although humans haven't yet encountered aliens, doesn't mean they don't exist, given the vastness of the universe. Infact, I guarantee that life exists elsewhere in the universe due to statistical probability. Whether that life is more advanced, just advanced, less advanced, or even SAPIENT is totally unknowable.

It only makes sense for there to be more life out there. If you think about it why would we be the only planet in this vast gianourmas universe with life on it?
Image
User avatar
nobodyknows
Resident cynic
Resident cynic
Posts: 3197
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 5:45 am
Location: You can't really make this look funny anymore.
Contact:

Re: Philosophy debate of Religion, and Science

Post by nobodyknows »

I've always thought that the center point of the universe could be holding some form of intelligent being that we have no idea about. Not saying it's god, but it quite
possibly could be. For now, I just call it the center of the universe ':x...

note; I'd find it pretty funny if the center of the universe turned out to have a 'bridge' to another universe - in which humans just like ourselves existed - and that those humans had colonised the area immediately around the center of the universe, while doing research on it...
Image
User avatar
AuraTwilight
IT WAS OVER 9000!
IT WAS OVER 9000!
Posts: 8032
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 5:03 pm

Re: Philosophy debate of Religion, and Science

Post by AuraTwilight »

If you are a believer then what, and where do you think Heaven is, and like? What are the reasons for the other planets? What is the afterlife like before entering Heaven, or Hell?
According to Christian canon, Heaven isn't anywhere in physical reality, but is "with God." Other planets where interpreted as stars in the Bible, so they would hold the same purpose as any other star (one of many Biblical screw-ups). There is no afterlife "before" Heaven or Hell.
I've always thought that the center point of the universe could be holding some form of intelligent being that we have no idea about. Not saying it's god, but it quite
possibly could be. For now, I just call it the center of the universe ':x...
There is no "center of the universe." Even if the universe isn't infinite in size, it's probably bounded in on itself like a sphere or something. Anyway, anything at this sort of center point would probably be a Supernova, or empty space, due to the physics of the Big Bang. The closest model to how the universe is most likely shaped similarly to a donut due to matter being pushed away from the initial point.
note; I'd find it pretty funny if the center of the universe turned out to have a 'bridge' to another universe - in which humans just like ourselves existed - and that those humans had colonised the area immediately around the center of the universe, while doing research on it...
Unless the center of the universe is a White Hole (which would explain a lot about the Big Bang), I doubt it. The physical models proposed for budding a child universe via wormholes always involve the passage-way closing off as the universe "buds" off. I also guarantee that any such beings wouldn't be humans in any way, due to the statistical unlikeliness of beings evolving into anything resembling the Homo Sapien a second time in a place with infinitely different environmental circumstances.
All will obey the mighty Auratwilight
AT, you are officially the greatest person in the world.
DO NOT F*CK WITH AURATWILIGHT!
NEVER EVER lecture AT. He/she is the Dr. House of these boards.
Please do not PM me. Use my email.
User avatar
_Tri-edge_
Posts: 1768
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 2:20 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Philosophy debate of Religion, and Science

Post by _Tri-edge_ »

What if there is not "one" universe, but many universes?. A multiverse? :D

Yes, I was watching The One, but I would like to know what you guys think about that philosophy.
User avatar
Azure Knight
The Sasquatch King
The Sasquatch King
Posts: 2447
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 6:29 pm
Location: The Old Country

Re: Philosophy debate of Religion, and Science

Post by Azure Knight »

Are you asking about the idea of parallel universes, or universes totally different altogether?
TheSorrow wrote:...
Cool story, bro.
User avatar
_Tri-edge_
Posts: 1768
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 2:20 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Philosophy debate of Religion, and Science

Post by _Tri-edge_ »

Azure Knight wrote:Are you asking about the idea of parallel universes, or universes totally different altogether?
Well, I think the movie portrayed parallel, but I'm thinking on the lines of COMPLETELY different universes. Is that possible?
User avatar
nobodyknows
Resident cynic
Resident cynic
Posts: 3197
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 5:45 am
Location: You can't really make this look funny anymore.
Contact:

Re: Philosophy debate of Religion, and Science

Post by nobodyknows »

_Tri-edge_ wrote:
Azure Knight wrote:Are you asking about the idea of parallel universes, or universes totally different altogether?
Well, I think the movie portrayed parallel, but I'm thinking on the lines of COMPLETELY different universes. Is that possible?
anything's possible if you believe!!
Image

*been aching to use that image since I returned here*
Image
User avatar
Azure Knight
The Sasquatch King
The Sasquatch King
Posts: 2447
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 6:29 pm
Location: The Old Country

Re: Philosophy debate of Religion, and Science

Post by Azure Knight »

nobodyknows wrote:
_Tri-edge_ wrote:
Azure Knight wrote:Are you asking about the idea of parallel universes, or universes totally different altogether?
Well, I think the movie portrayed parallel, but I'm thinking on the lines of COMPLETELY different universes. Is that possible?
anything's possible if you believe!!
Image

*been aching to use that image since I returned here*
Imaaaaaaaagination!
TheSorrow wrote:...
Cool story, bro.
User avatar
shugo_lover
The Oath Keeper
The Oath Keeper
Posts: 2925
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 7:43 pm
Location: Neverland

Re: Philosophy debate of Religion, and Science

Post by shugo_lover »

nobodyknows wrote:I've always thought that the center point of the universe could be holding some form of intelligent being that we have no idea about. Not saying it's god, but it quite
possibly could be. For now, I just call it the center of the universe ':x...

note; I'd find it pretty funny if the center of the universe turned out to have a 'bridge' to another universe - in which humans just like ourselves existed - and that those humans had colonised the area immediately around the center of the universe, while doing research on it...
I bet that person in middle of the univrse is laughing at us right now.

Also I always thought things like the Big Bang and Evalution, to be a bunch of crap. I think we all crawled out of the ocean
Image
User avatar
Azure Knight
The Sasquatch King
The Sasquatch King
Posts: 2447
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 6:29 pm
Location: The Old Country

Re: Philosophy debate of Religion, and Science

Post by Azure Knight »

shugo_lover wrote:think we all crawled out of the ocean
That's... what evolution is...
TheSorrow wrote:...
Cool story, bro.
Locked