Page 1 of 2

Was G.U. Returner Canon or no?

Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 5:37 pm
by shadow of skeith
Can we base Returner as canon in the G.U. storyline?

Re: Was G.U. Returner Canon or no?

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 1:29 pm
by AuraTwilight
It is.

Re: Was G.U. Returner Canon or no?

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 1:37 pm
by _Tri-edge_
AuraTwilight wrote:It is.
Just out of curiosity to shadow of skeith's question, how?, since this was basically the Unison of G.U.

Re: Was G.U. Returner Canon or no?

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 4:39 pm
by AuraTwilight
Unison was purely for fun. Returner actually answered plot points.

Re: Was G.U. Returner Canon or no?

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:00 pm
by Ren_Geki
AuraTwilight wrote:Unison was purely for fun. Returner actually answered plot points.
Obviously Returner is going to allude to things that happened in G.U., but that doesn't mean it's canon. Unison made allusions to Aura giving Kite a new bracelet at the end of IMOQ, but that didn't make Unison anymore canon.

Re: Was G.U. Returner Canon or no?

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 6:02 pm
by TheSorrow
But because Aura giving Kite a new bracelet also happened in the Games, while in Returner the plot points they cover aren't answered by any other media. Both were for fun, but there's a difference between explaining AIDA's future after the games and simply having a party in Net Slum.

Re: Was G.U. Returner Canon or no?

Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 2:35 pm
by AuraTwilight
And, you know, OVAN'S RETURN FROM HIS COMA AND **** LOL. That kind've needed to be answered.

Re: Was G.U. Returner Canon or no?

Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 6:28 pm
by hanoodles
but partying is a story in its self who are you to say that getting drunk and some how scoring while playing an internet game isnt canon
TheSorrow wrote:But because Aura giving Kite a new bracelet also happened in the Games, while in Returner the plot points they cover aren't answered by any other media. Both were for fun, but there's a difference between explaining AIDA's future after the games and simply having a party in Net Slum.

Re: Was G.U. Returner Canon or no?

Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 6:40 pm
by AuraTwilight
but partying is a story in its self who are you to say that getting drunk and some how scoring while playing an internet game isnt canon
Because Sora never played the game again after waking up, and therefore can't be there for Unison, making it impossible. Not to mention that everyone was behaving out of character.

Re: Was G.U. Returner Canon or no?

Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 6:46 pm
by hanoodles
alchahole will do that to you and he didnt get comatosed until after unsion did he
AuraTwilight wrote:
but partying is a story in its self who are you to say that getting drunk and some how scoring while playing an internet game isnt canon
Because Sora never played the game again after waking up, and therefore can't be there for Unison, making it impossible. Not to mention that everyone was behaving out of character.

Re: Was G.U. Returner Canon or no?

Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 6:57 pm
by TheSorrow
He went comatose right when SIGN ended, which is before the events of IMOQ, and Unison is set after those events...so yeah, not even alcohol will make something like that possible. Maybe Unison could've been possible if we simply excluded Sora and kept everything else, but it doesn't really make much sense either way.

Re: Was G.U. Returner Canon or no?

Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 9:45 pm
by Kerath
Returner was much better than Unison... as soon as they started dancing in Unison I stabbed myself in the face

Re: Was G.U. Returner Canon or no?

Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 10:24 pm
by AuraTwilight
Hey now, Unison was awesome. Shut the hell up before Tsukasa monkey dance kicks you in the face.

Re: Was G.U. Returner Canon or no?

Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 12:05 am
by Keyaki
Tsukasa monkey dance kicks you in the face.
That was funny, but Silver Knight couldn't do it right

Re: Was G.U. Returner Canon or no?

Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 10:57 pm
by ShinoBee
Returner = canon.

Unison was so lame and too happy that people decided it was going to now be uncanon. TRUTH.

At least Returner was happy, in a good way.  Oh and it got more points for the delicious incest end.

Re: Was G.U. Returner Canon or no?

Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 6:55 pm
by Kerath
ShinoBee wrote:Returner = canon.

 Oh and it got more points for the delicious incest end.
More like wincest, amirite?

Re: Was G.U. Returner Canon or no?

Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:30 pm
by ShinoBee
Kerath wrote:
ShinoBee wrote:Returner = canon.

 Oh and it got more points for the delicious incest end.
More like wincest, amirite?
**** YEAH SEAKING!

 I don't know, I totally saw incest with that ending. It better be canon! I expect some nii-san and loli action later yo.

Re: Was G.U. Returner Canon or no?

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 2:50 pm
by Keyaki
Because Sora never played the game again after waking up, and therefore can't be there for Unison, making it impossible.
What about the Sora AI, that Helba made at the end of Quarintine?

Re: Was G.U. Returner Canon or no?

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:08 pm
by AuraTwilight
Keyaki wrote:
Because Sora never played the game again after waking up, and therefore can't be there for Unison, making it impossible.
What about the Sora AI, that Helba made at the end of Quarintine?
One, Helba didn't make it, she found it.

Two, Sora and Subaru returned as their real selves, and I don't see why Sora would be the exception, especially given that he acts different from the AI.

Re: Was G.U. Returner Canon or no?

Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:00 am
by Spin
I thought Returner was... weird. <.<

Not as weird as Unison, but still.

Nothing has happened to make the events of Returner impossible and the .hack peoples havn't said it isn't so, therefore it's canon for all intents and purposes.