How canon is Roots?

User avatar
Haseo{Terror of Death}
Protagonist
Posts: 3682
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 12:02 am
Location: "...in the rift between consciousness and unconsciousness of all souls..."

Re: How canon is Roots?

Post by Haseo{Terror of Death} »

lol, I think episode 26 is 50% canon like the only half that is canon is the Phyllo dying, and the non-canon ness is Silverknight, Sabuoru and Totha, but then again, did Tohta really meet with Haseo much anyway?
User avatar
AuraTwilight
IT WAS OVER 9000!
IT WAS OVER 9000!
Posts: 8032
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 5:03 pm

Re: How canon is Roots?

Post by AuraTwilight »

Yes, he did. Roots is 100% canon.
User avatar
Haseo{Terror of Death}
Protagonist
Posts: 3682
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 12:02 am
Location: "...in the rift between consciousness and unconsciousness of all souls..."

Re: How canon is Roots?

Post by Haseo{Terror of Death} »

AuraTwilight wrote:Yes, he did. Roots is 100% canon.
What meant was that Tohta and Haseo had little connection and I still boubt is 100% deadonness
User avatar
Fragments.beta
Posts: 765
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 6:02 pm
Location: I am not here

Re: How canon is Roots?

Post by Fragments.beta »

Haseo{Terror of Death} wrote:
AuraTwilight wrote:Yes, he did. Roots is 100% canon.
What meant was that Tohta and Haseo had little connection and I still boubt is 100% deadonness
Its called retcon. There are some conflicts yes, but its all canon.
User avatar
AuraTwilight
IT WAS OVER 9000!
IT WAS OVER 9000!
Posts: 8032
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 5:03 pm

Re: How canon is Roots?

Post by AuraTwilight »

lol fo' multiple perspectives~~~[/singing]

Roots shows us what GU didn't, and GU shows us what Roots didn't. Just because Roots doesn't show us the Haseo/Sakaki argument doesn't mean it doesn't happen. So how come people are claiming stuff like Saburou being at the AK fight or Haseo/Tohta talking if GU doesn't show it? They're both equally important and canon. Get over it and expand your worldview.
Post Reply